The Long(er) and Winding Road to IMS

The next great phase in the annals of telecommunications infrastructure is the IP Multimedia Subsystem, or IMS. The question is the extent to which the cable industry adopts this new approach.

As the name implies, IMS is based on use of the Internet protocol. The idea is that using IP as the base communications language for everything - from content to apps and management data - will eliminate the demarcations between wireless and wired networks. It also will enable the mounting of new services in far more modular and simpler fashion. Once an IMS core is up and running, services can be inaugurated or ended by simply adding or eliminating application servers. A side benefit is that the spectrum formerly dedicated to 3G voice can be utilized for other purposes.

The drawback is that the implementation of IMS is not a tweak. It is a fundamental change-out deep within the network that involves significant investment and planning. Often, such projects are justified by a "killer app" against which the project can be planned. In the case of IMS, the clear killer app is Voice over Long Term Evolution (VoLTE). The early days of 4G service - days that continue for almost all carriers today - featured LTE networks that carried only data. Voice continued to be trafficked on 3G. Transitioning mobile voice to 4G is an important - and some would say necessary - step for carriers.

In early August, three telecommunications carriers - SK Telecom and LG Uplus in South Korea and MetroPCS in the United States - introduced VoLTE. Indeed, it was a bit of a space race, with the three companies announcing their services in a span of a couple of days and controversy erupting over who was first.

Regardless of which carrier won, the reality is that the news meant that the era of IMS had arrived.

The challenge for cable operators is that, by and large, they opted to bypass the VoLTE killer app as the justification to move into IMS. By and large, the cable industry has passed up the idea of a native smartphone business. The biggest step the industry has taken into the smartphone business is the partnerships that Time Warner Cable, Cox and Comcast have struck with Verizon Wireless. The approach of teaming with a traditional foe in a manner in which the strength of each is leveraged indeed may be savvy. But it removes the need to rebuild the network in a way that is optimized for wireless voice services. The killer app, in other words, is dead.

Industry analyst Alan Qualye said that about two years ago cable operators began considering IMS as a replacement for their interim softswitch strategy. The initial burst of enthusiasm - which led to lab tests and field trials - has chilled as the mobile voice plans went on hold and the complexity of IMS deployments became clear. Many of those initial plans have stalled. Rogers, Qualye said, is an exception because it offers its own mobile voice service and therefore has the same justification as the cellular carriers.

While the timeline for IMS may be lengthening, it is not a dead issue for cable operators. A driver - perhaps not as potent as voice services, but a driver nonetheless - is PacketCable 2.0. The standard assumes the availability of IMS. This, said Diane Myers, the principal analyst for VoIP, UC and IMS for Infonetics Research, is keeping IMS on track. "The cable operators may not be leading the way, but are progressing quite quickly in terms of IMS networks," she said. Myers wrote a research report released earlier this month that had mixed results for the worldwide IMS market: It was down 4% in the third quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter, but up 8% over the third quarter of 2011.

Shailin Sehgal, CTO of Genband's networking business unit, said top MSOs in the United States are engaged in either lab trials or friendly-user tests. Sehgal said IMS will provide the multimedia functionality for PacketCable 2.0 and therefore is an inevitable step for cable operators.

Initially, the decision to move to IMS may have been made with mobility in mind, but the basic abandonment by much of the industry of a native mobile service has switched - not eliminated - the impetus. "Most CTOs in the cable industry in North America have pretty much decided that IMS is the core network they need to build for PacketCable 2.0 for multimedia services," Sehgal said. "Mobility has nothing to do with it."

Carl Weinschenk is the Senior Editor of Broadband Technology Report. Reach him at carl@btreport.net.

Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account.

Related Articles

Comcast

Comcast Biz to Expand NorCal Ethernet

April 6, 2015 Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Business announced an expansion of its multi-giga...
Time Warner Cable

TWC Deploys Casa CCAP in NYC

April 6, 2015 Time Warner Cable (NYSE:TWC) has completed the deployment of high-speed ...
Ruckus Wireless ZoneFlex R710

Raising a WiFi Ruckus

April 4, 2015 Ruckus Wireless (NYSE:RKUS) has unveiled it ZoneFlex R710 WiFi access po...

BTR Blogs

BTR Senior Editor Carl Weinschenk

The Unbundling End Game

April 1, 2015 Cable operators better watch out. The conditions that have kept their br...
Yassini

White Space and Rouzbeh Yassini's Next Act

March 18, 2015 People who have been around the cable industry for a while know Rouzbeh ...
BTR Managing Editor Ron Hendrickson

Gigabit: Bigger Isn't Always Better

March 18, 2015 A funny thing happened on the way to gigabit: The little rural telcos gr...

White Papers & Special Reports

Test, Measurement & Monitoring Grows More Complex…And More Vital, Part II

March 2015 March is Test, Measurement and Monitoring month at Broadband Technology Repor...

Test, Measurement & Monitoring Grows More Complex…And More Vital, Part I

March 2015 Test, Measurement and Monitoring always was an important topic for cable oper...

5 Steps to Solving the TV Everywhere Dilemma for Operators

March 2015 We are in the midst of a massive shift in how and where television viewers ac...

Webcasts

DOCSIS 3.1 Update

The new DOCSIS 3.1 spec will bring with it a host of advantages for the cable operator in both speed and bandwidth. However, DOCSIS 3.1 rollouts will not be "plug and play" easy in all cases.

This webcast will be moderated by Ron Hranac and sponsored by Trilithic, Inc.

December 10, 2014
Sponsored By

Expo 2014 Retrospective: A Roadmap for Technology in 2015

Now that we've all had a little time to digest the many events and technologies of SCTE Cable-Tec EXPO 2014, what trends emerge as the hot topics to watch in the coming year? Join BTR Managing Editor Ron Hendrickson and a panel of experts as they run down the trends and pick out the key takeaways from this year's show in a Special Event Webcast.

November 4, 2014
Sponsored By

Featured Hangout

Three Technologies, One Conversation

October 28, 2014

Join BTR in an exclusive Google Hangout for a wide-ranging 30-minute informal discussion of the latest in multiscreen video, home gateways, and testing/monitoring of DOCSIS 3.1 and fiber networks.
Sponsored by Alticast, Hitron Technologies, SCTE, and VeEX.

Featured Podcast

Cox's Guy McCormick on QoS and QoE

November 5, 2014

Listen as Carl Weinschenk, Senior Editor for Broadband Technology Report, and Guy McCormick, Cox Communications' Senior Vice President of Engineering, discuss QoS and QoE.

Watch BTR'S Tech Breakfast - Prepping the Plant for DOCSIS 3.1

Are you getting ready for DOSCIS 3.1?

Watch BTR and its panel of experts as we explore preparations and planning inside the plant for the introduction of DOCSIS 3.1 in the coming years. Tune in and see BTR contributing writer and Cisco Technical Leader Ron Hranac moderate a forum of industry veterans.

Watch the presentation

 

Sign up for BTR's FREE newsletters

CONNECT WITH US